Altmetrics - Wikipedia. This article is about alternative scholarly impact metrics. It is not to be confused with article- level metrics. Although altmetrics are often thought of as metrics about articles, they can be applied to people, journals, books, data sets, presentations, videos, source code repositories, web pages, etc. They are related to Webometrics, which had similar goals but evolved before the social web. Altmetrics did not originally cover citation counts. Several publishers have started providing such information to readers, including Bio. Diabetes mellitus is a complex, chronic illness requiring continuous medical care with multifactorial risk reduction strategies beyond glycemic control.Diagnostics (ISSN 2075-4418; CODEN: DIAGC9) is an international, open access journal on medical diagnosis published quarterly online by MDPI. Med Central, Public Library of Science (PLOS). The following table shows the number of papers covered by services: Website. Number of papers. Plum Analytics~ 2. A classification of altmetrics was proposed by Impact. Story in September 2. Traditionally, an author would wish to publish in a journal with a high subscription rate, so many people would have access to the research. With the introduction of web technologies it became possible to actually count how often a single paper was looked at. Typically, publishers count the number of HTML views and PDF views. As early as 2. 00. BMJ published the number of views for its articles, which was found to be somewhat correlated to citations. Typical sources of data to calculate this metric include Facebook, Google+, Twitter, Science Blogs, and Wikipedia pages. The correlation between the mentions and likes and citation by primary scientific literature has been studied, and a slight correlation at best was found, e. Various platforms exist that keep track of which papers are being blogged about. Altmetric. com is one that uses this information for calculating metrics, while other tools just report where discussion is happening, such as Research. Blogging and Chemical blogspace. Moreover, platforms may even provide a formal way of ranking papers or recommending papers otherwise, such as Faculty of 1. Even more informative is the number of people that bookmark a paper. Objective To model the impacts of the bicycle sharing system in London on the health of its users. Design Health impact modelling and evaluation, using a. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association is a peer-reviewed medical journal published 48 times a year by the American Medical Association. Welcome to Blood Cancer Journal. Online * Open Access * Highest Quality Research. Blood Cancer Journal seeks to publish articles of the highest quality related to. The idea behind this metric is that someone would not bookmark a paper of little influence to their own work. Providers of such information include science specific social bookmarking services such as Cite. ULike and Mendeley. Besides the traditional metrics based on citations in scientific literature, for example as obtained from Google Scholar, Cross. Ref, Pub. Med Central, and Scopus, altmetrics also adopts citations in secondary and other knowledge sources. For example, Impact. Story counts the number of times a paper has been referenced by Wikipedia. Proponents of altmetrics make clear that many of the metrics show influence or engagement, rather than impact on the progress of science. Limitations that affect the usefulness due to heterogeneity, data quality and particular dependencies have been studied. Even more informative than knowing how often a paper is cited, is which papers are citing it. That information allows researchers to see how their work is impacting the field (or not). Providers of metrics also typically provide access to the information from which the metrics were calculated. For example, Web of Science shows which are the citing papers, Impact. Story shows which Wikipedia pages are referencing the paper, and Cited. In shows which databases extracted data from the paper. One example is the number of tweets linking to a paper where the number can vary widely depending on how the tweets are collected. For example, a much discussed paper may merely be very controversial: papers discussed on Retraction Watch will typically get high altmetrics score, despite being retracted from the literature. Altmetrics for more recent articles may be higher because of the increasing uptake of the social web and because articles may be mentioned mainly when they are published. Public Library of Science has an Altmetrics Collection. Public Library of Science (PLOS). Altmetrics is the study and use of non- traditional scholarly impact measures that are based on activity in web- based environments ^. British Journal of General Practice. University of California, Berkeley. Opening Science: The Evolving Guide on How the Internet Is Changing Research, Collaboration and Scholarly Publishing. Cham: Springer International Publishing. ISBN 9. 78- 3- 3. OCLC 9. 06. 26. 91. Altmetrics and article- level metrics are sometimes used interchangeably, but there are important differences: article- level metrics also include citations and usage data; .. IEEE Spectrum. 4. ISSN 0. 01. 8- 9. Serials Review. 3. Impact. Story. Michael (1. April 2. 01. 6). Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries. Plum Analytics. Plum Analytics. July 2. 00. 5. Archived from the original on 2. September 2. 00. 9. Public Library of Science (PLOS). Market. Watch. Metrics of social impact based on Twitter and correlation with traditional metrics of scientific impact. Journal of medical Internet research. PMC 3. 27. 81. 09 . PMID 2. 21. 73. 20. PMID 2. 34. 07. 53. Retrieved 3. 1 March 2. Impact. Story Blog. Information Standards Quarterly. PMC 5. 16. 10. 5 . PMID 1. 53. 45. 62. Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact. Journal of Medical Internet Research. PMC 3. 27. 81. 09 . PMID 2. 21. 73. 20. Impact. Story. Times Higher Education. Journal of Biomedical Semantics. Suppl 1): S6–S1. PMC 2. PMID 2. 06. 26. 92. PMID 2. 34. 07. 52. Scientometrics. 1. Beall, Article- Level Metrics: An Ill- Conceived and Meretricious Idea, 2. Holbrook, J. B.; Barr, K. R.; Brown, K. 4. 97 (7. PMID 2. 36. 98. 43. Nature Precedings. Information Standards Quarterly. Times Higher Education. Twitter and Ten Other Social Web Services. PMC 3. 66. 56. 24 . PMID 2. 37. 24. 10. Ouzounis, Christos A., ed. PMC 3. 48. 67. 95 . PMID 2. 31. 33. 65. Information Standards Quarterly (ISQ). Summer 2. 01. 3. Aslib Journal of Information Management. ISSN 2. 05. 0- 3. El Profesional de la Informaci. El Profesional de la Informaci. El Profesional de la Informaci.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
August 2017
Categories |